Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVasdev, Nikhil
dc.contributor.authorCharlesworth, Philip
dc.contributor.authorSlack, Mark
dc.contributor.authorAdshead, Jim
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T12:15:02Z
dc.date.available2023-03-17T12:15:02Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-13
dc.identifier.citationVasdev , N , Charlesworth , P , Slack , M & Adshead , J 2023 , ' Preclinical evaluation of the Versius surgical system: A next‐generation surgical robot for use in minimal access prostate surgery ' , BJUI Compass , vol. 4 , no. 4 , pp. 482-490 . https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.233
dc.identifier.issn2688-4526
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 956130
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 956130
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: bco2233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/26128
dc.description© 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the Versius surgical system for robot‐assisted prostatectomy in a preclinical cadaveric model using varying system setups and collect surgeon feedback on the performance of the system and instruments, in line with IDEAL‐D recommendations. Materials and methods: Procedures were performed in cadaveric specimens by consultant urological surgeons to evaluate system performance in completing the surgical steps required for a prostatectomy. Procedures were conducted using either a 3‐arm or 4‐arm bedside unit (BSU) setup. Optimal port placements and BSU layouts were determined and surgeon feedback collected. Procedure success was defined as the satisfactory completion of all steps of the procedure, according to the operating surgeon. Results: All four prostatectomies were successfully completed; two were completed with a 3‐arm BSU setup and two using a 4‐arm BSU setup. Small adjustments were made to the port and BSU positioning, according to surgeon preference, in order to complete the surgical steps. The surgeons noted some instrument difficulties with the Monopolar Curved Scissor tip and the Needle Holders, which were subsequently refined between the first and second sessions of the study, in line with surgeon feedback. Three cystectomies were also successfully completed, demonstrating the capability of the system to perform additional urological procedures. Conclusions: This study provides a preclinical assessment of a next‐generation surgical robot for prostatectomies. All procedures were completed successfully, and port and BSU positions were validated, thus supporting the progression of the system to further clinical development according to the IDEAL‐D framework.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent1676803
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBJUI Compass
dc.subjectORIGINAL ARTICLE
dc.subjectORIGINAL ARTICLES
dc.subjectcystectomy
dc.subjectminimal access surgery
dc.subjectprostatectomy
dc.subjectrobot‐assisted surgery
dc.subjecturological surgical procedures
dc.subjectrobot-assisted surgery
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titlePreclinical evaluation of the Versius surgical system: A next‐generation surgical robot for use in minimal access prostate surgeryen
dc.contributor.institutionExtracellular Vesicle Research Unit
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176248152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/bco2.233
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record