Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlu-Ajayi, Razak
dc.contributor.authorAlaka, Hafiz
dc.contributor.authorOwolabi, Hakeem
dc.contributor.authorAkanbi, Lukman
dc.contributor.authorGaniyu, Sikiru
dc.contributor.editorLee, Eul-Bum
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T10:45:01Z
dc.date.available2023-04-17T10:45:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-09
dc.identifier.citationOlu-Ajayi , R , Alaka , H , Owolabi , H , Akanbi , L , Ganiyu , S & Lee , E-B (ed.) 2023 , ' Data-Driven Tools for Building Energy Consumption Prediction: A Review ' , Energies , vol. 16 , no. 6 , 2574 , pp. 1-20 . https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062574
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 1002994
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: energies-16-02574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/26170
dc.description© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.description.abstractThe development of data-driven building energy consumption prediction models has gained more attention in research due to its relevance for energy planning and conservation. However, many studies have conducted the inappropriate application of data-driven tools for energy consumption prediction in the wrong conditions. For example, employing a data-driven tool to develop a model using a small sample size, despite the recognition of the tool for producing good results in large data conditions. This study delivers a review of 63 studies with a precise focus on evaluating the performance of data-driven tools based on certain conditions; i.e., data properties, the type of energy considered, and the type of building explored. This review identifies gaps in research and proposes future directions in the field of data-driven building energy consumption prediction. Based on the studies reviewed, the outcome of the evaluation of the data-driven tools performance shows that Support Vector Machine (SVM) produced better performance than other data-driven tools in the majority of the review studies. SVM, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Random Forest (RF) produced better performances in more studies than statistical tools such as Linear Regression (LR) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA). However, it is deduced that none of the reviewed tools are predominantly better than the other tools in all conditions. It is clear that data-driven tools have their strengths and weaknesses, and tend to elicit distinctive results in different conditions. Hence, this study provides a proposed guideline for the selection tool based on strengths and weaknesses in different conditions.en
dc.format.extent20
dc.format.extent2919779
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnergies
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectbuilding energy consumption prediction
dc.subjectdata driven tools
dc.subjectenergy conservation
dc.subjectenergy efficiency
dc.subjectenergy prediction
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectControl and Optimization
dc.subjectEnergy (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectEngineering (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectEnergy Engineering and Power Technology
dc.subjectElectrical and Electronic Engineering
dc.subjectFuel Technology
dc.subjectRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
dc.titleData-Driven Tools for Building Energy Consumption Prediction: A Reviewen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Hertfordshire
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151400530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/en16062574
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record