Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authord’Andrea, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorMancusi, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorSantovito, Maria Chiara
dc.contributor.authorMarrangone, Carlotta
dc.contributor.authorMartino, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorSantorelli, Mario
dc.contributor.authorMiuli, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorDi Carlo, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorSignorelli, Maria Salvina
dc.contributor.authorClerici, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorPettorruso, Mauro
dc.contributor.authorMartinotti, Giovanni
dc.contributor.editorGalecki, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T13:00:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T13:00:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-21
dc.identifier.citationd’Andrea , G , Mancusi , G , Santovito , M C , Marrangone , C , Martino , F , Santorelli , M , Miuli , A , Di Carlo , F , Signorelli , M S , Clerici , M , Pettorruso , M , Martinotti , G & Galecki , P (ed.) 2023 , ' Investigating the Role of Maintenance TMS Protocols for Major Depression: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives for Personalized Interventions ' , Journal of Personalized Medicine , vol. 13 , no. 4 , 697 , pp. 1-19 . https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040697
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 1064471
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: jpm-13-00697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/26195
dc.description© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.description.abstractRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been approved by the FDA as an effective intervention for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). However, there is little evidence about maintenance protocol necessity. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, characterize, and evaluate the current maintenance TMS protocols for MDD and TRD patients who have received acute treatment. A literature search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines of 2015 on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for publications up to March 2022. Fourteen articles were included. High protocol heterogeneity was observed. Most studies highlighted significant efficacy of maintenance protocols in decreasing relapse risk, suggesting that administering two or fewer stimulations per month is ineffective in sustaining an antidepressant effect or in reducing the risk of relapse in responder patients. The risk of relapse was most pronounced after five months from the acute treatment. Maintenance TMS appears to be a resourceful strategy to maintain acute antidepressant treatment effects, significantly reducing relapse risk. The ease of administering and the ability to monitor treatment adherence should be considered when evaluating the future use of maintenance TMS protocols. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of overlapping acute TMS effects with maintenance protocols and to evaluate their long-term effectiveness.en
dc.format.extent19
dc.format.extent830079
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Personalized Medicine
dc.subjectSystematic Review
dc.subjectrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectmaintenance
dc.subjectmajor depressive disorder
dc.subjecttreatment-resistant depression
dc.subjectneuromodulation
dc.subjectrescue TMS
dc.subjecttapering TMS
dc.subjectcontinuation TMS
dc.subjectcluster TMS
dc.subjectpersonalized medicine
dc.subjectMedicine (miscellaneous)
dc.titleInvestigating the Role of Maintenance TMS Protocols for Major Depression: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives for Personalized Interventionsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154044801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/jpm13040697
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record