Subjugation and Subterfuge: Struggling with Metrics as a Middle Manager in a UK Business School
Abstract
This thesis explores the behaviours and emotions which emerge when middle managers in Higher
Education (HE) use metrics as a tool to measure organisational performance. It uses autoethnography
as a methodological approach, employing research narratives and reflexive inquiry.
These narratives explore micro-interactions at work to enquire into the social, political and
emotional relationships which emerge when managing using metrics. Whilst recognising that metrics
may be useful at an abstract level as a means of opening an exploration of what gets done and what
is valued, this research also identifies that metrics can be taken up in ways that may also be used to
blame and shame others. Managing using metrics in this way can lead middle managers to feel as if
they are stuck ‘in the middle’, lacking agency. This raises ethical concerns with regard to the
uncritical application of metrics. These feelings of ‘stuckness’ are often not discussed in formal
meetings, instead they tend to be expressed in jokes, lewd gestures and gossip.
Managing using metrics may present middle managers with a double bind (being stuck between two
unpalatable choices) which can lead to feelings of futility and a lack of agency. Acknowledging
feelings of hopelessness, subjugation and stuck patterns could enable managers to become more
aware of their habitual responses. They may then come to recognise that there are moral decisions
to be made about what they can question and what they may do which could enable them to act in
political ways that may be more nuanced.
This thesis also highlights that strong emotions may emerge when metrics are used. This may make
it harder to talk about how we are working together, including our vulnerabilities. Acknowledging
that metrics may evoke emotional responses may help middle managers increase their capacity for
coping with the anxieties of feeling ‘caught in the middle’. As we come to expect strong emotions,
we may be able to engage, more imaginatively, in how we might act.
Processes of subjugation and subterfuge emerge in paradoxical patterns of conforming and resisting,
and inclusion and exclusion, and emerge as gossip, joking and ribald acts, which have the potential
to shift existing power relations. Subterfuge is a ubiquitous emergent pattern which middle
managers might expect to see in working with metrics, and which can be paradoxically constructive
and destructive (and sometimes both at the same time). Subversive acts are not simply pejorative
Subjugation and Subterfuge: Struggling with Metrics as a Middle Manager in a UK Business School
activities. They are both a chance to try to keep work human in a metricised environment and also
to play a valuable part in the negotiation of who we are and how teams work together.
Publication date
2021-05-20Published version
https://doi.org/10.18745/th.27194https://doi.org/10.18745/th.27194
Funding
Default funderDefault project
Other links
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/27194Metadata
Show full item recordThe following license files are associated with this item: