Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUnver, Mehmet Bilal
dc.contributor.editorAlgoritmi, Centro
dc.contributor.editorReuters, Thomson
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T10:30:01Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T10:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-07
dc.identifier.citationUnver , M B 2023 , Rebuilding 'ethics' to govern AI: How to re-set the boundaries for the legal sector? in C Algoritmi & T Reuters (eds) , ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . ICAIL'23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law , ACM Press , NY, United States , pp. 306-315 , ICAIL 2023: Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law , Braga , Portugal , 19/06/23 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595156
dc.identifier.citationconference
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-0197-9
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7952-2634/work/149287835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/27328
dc.description© 2023 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). This is an open access conference contribution distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has been transforming the legal sector and profession given every day enhancing AI-driven legal tech tools. Considering the far-reaching ethical implications of such tools and the disparate functionalities of 'AI ethics' and 'legal ethics', this paper puts into question the interplay between these ethical domains and their underlying rules. After fleshing out the governance of ethics under each domain, e.g. respectively professional conduct rules and self-regulatory principles, and signposting the unresolved ethical challenges of status quo, e.g. particularly concerning cross-domain issues, the paper discusses how they need to interact, based on the three policy options: 'revision of the conduct rules', 'individual (company level) collaboration' and 'higher-level collaboration'. It is concluded that 'higher-level collaboration' between the stakeholders is found to be the most sustainable and long-term option given the need to mitigate the ethical challenges concerning the legal sector from a holistic point of view.en
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent677796
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherACM Press
dc.relation.ispartofICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICAIL'23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
dc.subjectAI Ethics
dc.subjectLegal Ethics
dc.subjectTransparency
dc.subjectFairness
dc.subjectAccountability
dc.subjectfairness
dc.subjectAI ethics
dc.subjectLegal ethics
dc.subjecttransparency
dc.subjectaccountability
dc.subjectGeneral Social Sciences
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titleRebuilding 'ethics' to govern AI: How to re-set the boundaries for the legal sector?en
dc.contributor.institutionSchools of Law and Education
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177853536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1145/3594536.3595156
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record