Understanding the Perspectives of UK-Based Family Members of People who have Chosen to End their Life by Assisted Dying
Abstract
Assisted dying is growing global momentum as an option to end unbearable suffering in
particular medical circumstances, but remains illegal in the UK. Currently, UK citizens
wishing for an assisted death must go to Switzerland; the only country to offer this service to
non-citizens, but it is expected, by law, that family members do not facilitate this. This study
sought to understand the perspectives of UK-based family members of people who have
had an assisted death on assisted dying, to understand the contexts informing these
perspectives, how they might connect with prior views on death and dying and the resources
that they draw on during this period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five
family members. This data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis,
revealing four themes (A life dictated by illness, Life as autonomous, Navigating an “illegal”
landscape and Assisted dying should be legalised). The results showed that family members
felt there was a role for assisted dying in particular contexts related to experienced or preempted
unbearable suffering associated with a medical diagnosis, and/or when the
individual felt ‘ready’ to die. These perspectives appeared to be informed by views around
the importance of autonomy and choice, the perceived importance of independence and the
burden associated with being cared for, and experiences of navigating the process in the
current UK context. Participants also shared what has helped them during this time (e.g.
maintaining life as usual, connecting with close others and new hobbies). It is hoped these
results can contribute to the current debate about the legalisation of assisted dying in the
UK, to relevant policies should the UK legalise assisted dying, and to care considerations for
tailoring support offered to individuals and families at times when an assisted death may be
considered. Further research is needed to understand a wider range of perspectives within
the UK on this topic.
Publication date
2023-10-10Published version
https://doi.org/10.18745/th.27421https://doi.org/10.18745/th.27421
Funding
Default funderDefault project
Other links
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/27421Metadata
Show full item recordThe following license files are associated with this item: