Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReed, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorHunn, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Tiffany
dc.contributor.authorBosworth, Robyn
dc.contributor.authorGee, Brioney
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Clio
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T13:00:02Z
dc.date.available2024-05-22T13:00:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-20
dc.identifier.citationReed , J , Hunn , L , Smith , T , Bosworth , R , Gee , B , Berry , C & Clarke , T 2024 , ' Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of youth and young adult models of mental health care ' , Early Intervention in Psychiatry , pp. 1-8 . https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13555
dc.identifier.issn1751-7885
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 1981164
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: eip13555
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2105-027X/work/160262066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/27907
dc.description© 2024 The Author(s). Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractAim: It is increasingly recognised that traditional models of mental health (MH) care, with a service transition at age 18 years, may not reflect best practice. The literature supports a move towards youth and young adult focused models of MH care, for young people up to the age of 25, which specifically cater to the unique psychosocial and developmental needs of this population. This service evaluation aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of youth models of MH care across England (UK). Methods: Six services participated in separate focus groups pertaining to their experience of implementing youth models of MH care. The interview guide for the focus groups was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and explored barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainment. The focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results: Seven key themes relevant to the implementation of youth models of MH care were identified: a clear rationale for doing things differently, for young people by young people, “building those relationships is key”, service identity development, resource and infrastructure, leadership at multiple levels, and valuing and developing staff. Conclusions: The findings suggest effective communication and leadership, co‐production and cross system collaboration contribute to successful implementation of youth models of MH care. The findings will be of interest to those involved in informing and supporting successful implementation and delivery of youth models of mental health care at local and national levels.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent1003561
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
dc.subjectyoung adult mental health
dc.subjectqualitative
dc.subjectimplementation
dc.subjectadolescent mental health
dc.subjectyouth models of mental health care
dc.titleBarriers and facilitators in the implementation of youth and young adult models of mental health careen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth and Clinical Psychology Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sports
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/eip.13555
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record