Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbdelsalam Elshenawy, Rasha
dc.contributor.authorAslanpour, Zoe
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T10:15:01Z
dc.date.available2024-09-17T10:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-12
dc.identifier.citationAbdelsalam Elshenawy , R & Aslanpour , Z 2024 ' SWOT Analysis and Insights into the Health Research Authority Approval Process for COVID-19 Antimicrobial Stewardship Research in UK Secondary Care: Advocating Think Ethics. ' Research Square Preprints , pp. 1-7 . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3850527/v2
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2567-0540/work/167949185
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8954-0817/work/167949242
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/28179
dc.description© 2024 Research Square. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Health Research Authority's (HRA) approval process, guided by the 'Think Ethics' principal, for an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) research project at an English NHS Foundation Trust during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing a SWOT analysis to reflect critically on the process, the project encompassed a retrospective examination of patient records and a survey of healthcare workers, navigating the application of the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS). The HRA's streamlined procedures, involving intensive reviews by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) and regulatory checks, refined the approval process, precluding the need for multiple assessments across NHS bodies. Achieving HRA consent necessitated adherence to confidentiality protocols and the submission of extensive documentation. Only upon securing all requisite regulatory approvals could the project proceed, highlighting the essentiality of proficient project management and strategic communication. The study's outcomes shed light on AMS practices, the shifts in antibiotic prescribing patterns, and the pandemic's influence on these dynamics. Crucially, the investigation emphasised the vital importance of robust AMS in managing antibiotic utilisation and in combating antimicrobial resistance. Reflecting on this journey emphasises the importance of involving the public and patients, creating effective participant information sheets (PIS), registering research projects in databases, such as ISRCTN and OCTOPUS, and constructively addressing feedback. These lessons has significantly enhanced the authors' research skills, emphasising the crucial importance of ethical consideration and transparent communication in academic research. This article offers a thorough reflection of the Health Research Authority approval process, advocating its adoption in future antimicrobial stewardship and antimicrobial resistance investigations, which are imperative to global health. Moreover, undertaking a SWOT analysis has yielded strategic insights, facilitating a more informed approach to the process of the HRA approval process, especially in relation to COVID-19 antimicrobial stewardship research within UK secondary care.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.extent358539
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherResearch Square Preprints
dc.relation.ispartof
dc.subjectHealth Research Authority (HRA)
dc.subjectHealth research design
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectethics committee member roles
dc.subjectEthics Committees
dc.subjectEthics Committees, Research
dc.subjectEthics training
dc.subjectresearch ethics
dc.subjectresearch ethics committees
dc.subjectResearch Ethics
dc.subjectethical
dc.subjectethical concerns
dc.subjectethical decision-making
dc.subjectethical guidelines
dc.subjectEthical issues
dc.subjectethical principles
dc.subjectThink Ethics
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Stewardship (AMS)
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Stewardship
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship programme
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship programs
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Stewardship/methods
dc.subjectantimicrobial
dc.subjectantimicrobial agents
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Classification
dc.subjectantimicrobial cultures
dc.subjectantimicrobial efficacy
dc.subjectantimicrobial resistance
dc.subjectAntimicrobial properties
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
dc.subjectantibacterial
dc.subjectANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY
dc.subjectantibacterial activity
dc.subjectAntibacterial performance
dc.subjectAntibioitcs
dc.subjectantibiotic classification
dc.subjectAntibiotic awareness week
dc.subjectantibiotic duration
dc.subjectAntibiotic guardian
dc.subjectAntibiotic Prescribing
dc.subjectAntibiotic research
dc.subjectAntibiotic Usage
dc.subjectantibiotic utilitsation
dc.subjectAntibiotics
dc.subjectSWOT Analysis
dc.subjectSWOT
dc.subjectNHS Foundation Trust
dc.subjectNHS England
dc.subjectNHS research
dc.subjectNHS Trust
dc.subjectCovid-19 pandemic
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectResearch Ethics Committee (REC)
dc.subjectIntegrated Research Application System (IRAS)
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Resistance
dc.subjectStrategic Communication
dc.titleSWOT Analysis and Insights into the Health Research Authority Approval Process for COVID-19 Antimicrobial Stewardship Research in UK Secondary Care: Advocating Think Ethics.en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionPublic Health and Patient Safety Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.21203/rs.3.rs-3850527/v2
rioxxterms.typeWorking paper
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record