Evaluating the factor structure and measurement invariance of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across multiple countries, languages, and gender identities
Author
Fournier, Loïs
Bőthe, Beáta
Demetrovics, Zsolt
Koós, Mónika
Kraus, Shane W.
Nagy, Léna
Potenza, Marc N.
Ballester-Arnal, Rafael
Batthyány, Dominik
Bergeron, Sophie
Briken, Peer
Burkauskas, Julius
Cárdenas-López, Georgina
Carvalho, Joana
Castro-Calvo, Jesús
Chen, Lijun
Ciocca, Giacomo
Corazza, Ornella
Csako, Rita I.
Fernandez, David P.
Fujiwara, Hironobu
Fernandez, Elaine F.
Fuss, Johannes
Gabrhelík, Roman
Gewirtz-Meydan, Ateret
Gjoneska, Biljana
Gola, Mateusz
Grubbs, Joshua B.
Hashim, Hashim T.
Saiful Islam, Md.
Ismail, Mustafa
Jiménez-Martínez, Martha C.
Jurin, Tanja
Kalina, Ondrej
Klein, Verena
Költő, András
Lee, Sang-Kyu
Lewczuk, Karol
Lin, Chung-Ying
Lochner, Christine
López-Alvarado, Silvia
Lukavská, Kateřina
Mayta-Tristán, Percy
Miller, Dan J.
Orosová, Oľga
Orosz, Gábor
Ponce, Fernando P.
Quintana, Gonzalo R.
Quintero Garzola, Gabriel C.
Ramos-Diaz, Jano
Rigaud, Kévin
Rousseau, Ann
De Tubino Scanavino, Marco
Schulmeyer, Marion K.
Sharan, Pratap
Shibata, Mami
Shoib, Sheikh
Sigre-Leirós, Vera
Sniewski, Luke
Spasovski, Ognen
Steibliene, Vesta
Stein, Dan J.
Strizek, Julian
Tsai, Meng-Che
Ünsal, Berk C.
Vaillancourt-Morel, Marie-Pier
Van Hout, Marie Claire
Billieux, Joël
Attention
2299/28342
Abstract
The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Model and the various psychometric instruments developed and validated based on this model are well established in clinical and research settings. However, evidence regarding the psychometric validity, reliability, and equivalence across multiple countries of residence, languages, or gender identities, including gender-diverse individuals, is lacking to date. Using data from the International Sex Survey (N?=?82,243), confirmatory factor analyses and measurement invariance analyses were performed on the preestablished five-factor structure of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale to examine whether (a) psychometric validity and reliability and (b) psychometric equivalence hold across 34 country-of-residence-related, 22 language-related, and three gender-identity-related groups. The results of the present study extend the latter psychometric instrument?s well-established relevance to 26 countries, 13 languages, and three gender identities. Most notably, psychometric validity and reliability were evidenced across nine novel translations included in the present study (i.e., Croatian, English, German, Hebrew, Korean, Macedonian, Polish, Portuguese?Portugal, and Spanish?Latin American) and psychometric equivalence was evidenced across all three gender identities included in the present study (i.e., women, men, and gender-diverse individuals).