dc.contributor.author | McMahon, Natalie | |
dc.contributor.author | Katie, Warner | |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Jacqui | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-15T23:05:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-15T23:05:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McMahon , N , Katie , W & Scott , J 2024 , ' A referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability service ' , Clinical Psychology Forum , vol. 1 , no. 374 , pp. 27-34 . https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1747-5732 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-7148-1273/work/169878598 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/28351 | |
dc.description | © 2024 The British Psychological Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27 | |
dc.description.abstract | Specialist community teams are set up to support people living with Learning Disability (LD) who are unable to access mainstream mental health (MH) teams with reasonable adjustments. National guidance is available to guide best practice in making reasonable adjustments, to support increased access to mainstream services. This audit of referrals into a specialist Community LD team, aimed to establish referral acceptance rates and reasons for referral rejection. Total referrals and referrals made specifically from mainstream MH teams were investigated. A focus group explored LD clinicians’ experiences of the referral process and criteria in the context of working alongside mainstream MH teams. A lower acceptance rate of referrals from mainstream MH teams than overall acceptance rate was found, and differences in the reasons for rejection were highlighted. No LD diagnosis in the referral was the most common rejection reason for mainstream MH team referrals. Thematic analysis highlighted four themes of clinician’s experiences which focused on: referral point struggles; service limitations; lack of diagnostic clarity; and attempts to bridge a gap between services. Recommendations include review of the referral process, joint working protocols, clarification of remit and dissemination of shared learning. | en |
dc.format.extent | 8 | |
dc.format.extent | 274681 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Psychology Forum | |
dc.subject | Learning disability | |
dc.subject | clinician experience | |
dc.subject | referrals | |
dc.subject | mental health | |
dc.subject | Learning Disability | |
dc.subject | Clinical Psychology | |
dc.title | A referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability service | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography | |
dc.contributor.institution | Health and Clinical Psychology Research Group | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Research in Psychology and Sports | |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Life and Medical Sciences | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191177553&partnerID=8YFLogxK | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |