Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorKatie, Warner
dc.contributor.authorScott, Jacqui
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T23:05:26Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T23:05:26Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-29
dc.identifier.citationMcMahon , N , Katie , W & Scott , J 2024 , ' A referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability service ' , Clinical Psychology Forum , vol. 1 , no. 374 , pp. 27-34 . https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27
dc.identifier.issn1747-5732
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7148-1273/work/169878598
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/28351
dc.description© 2024 The British Psychological Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27
dc.description.abstractSpecialist community teams are set up to support people living with Learning Disability (LD) who are unable to access mainstream mental health (MH) teams with reasonable adjustments. National guidance is available to guide best practice in making reasonable adjustments, to support increased access to mainstream services. This audit of referrals into a specialist Community LD team, aimed to establish referral acceptance rates and reasons for referral rejection. Total referrals and referrals made specifically from mainstream MH teams were investigated. A focus group explored LD clinicians’ experiences of the referral process and criteria in the context of working alongside mainstream MH teams. A lower acceptance rate of referrals from mainstream MH teams than overall acceptance rate was found, and differences in the reasons for rejection were highlighted. No LD diagnosis in the referral was the most common rejection reason for mainstream MH team referrals. Thematic analysis highlighted four themes of clinician’s experiences which focused on: referral point struggles; service limitations; lack of diagnostic clarity; and attempts to bridge a gap between services. Recommendations include review of the referral process, joint working protocols, clarification of remit and dissemination of shared learning.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent274681
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Psychology Forum
dc.subjectLearning disability
dc.subjectclinician experience
dc.subjectreferrals
dc.subjectmental health
dc.subjectLearning Disability
dc.subjectClinical Psychology
dc.titleA referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability serviceen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionHealth and Clinical Psychology Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sports
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191177553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.374.27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record