Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGopal, Sivashnie
dc.contributor.authorMinns Lowe, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorKumaran, Binoy
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T09:45:00Z
dc.date.available2024-11-05T09:45:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-09
dc.identifier.citationGopal , S , Minns Lowe , C & Kumaran , B 2024 , ' Diagnostic test accuracy of Tinel’s test in adults with carpal tunnel syndrome—a systematic review ' , Physical Therapy Reviews , pp. 1-12 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2024.2411178
dc.identifier.issn1083-3196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/28408
dc.description© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2024.2411178
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tinel’s test is commonly used in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) despite its questionable diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). This systematic review investigated the DTA of Tinel’s test in CTS using electrodiagnosis as the reference standard and explored the heterogeneity between included studies. Methods: Prospective studies evaluating Tinel’s test in adults with CTS were included. The principal measures were sensitivity and specificity. A literature search was conducted for studies published up to 7 June 2024. The methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Narrative synthesis of study results and heterogeneity was undertaken. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to the high variability in diagnostic thresholds. Results: Fifteen out of 4099 identified studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient selection scored ‘high’ in risk of bias and applicability concerns. Examiner blinding was poorly reported. Sensitivity varied from 30 to 89%. Specificity varied from 41 to 100%. Heterogeneity was found across all studies in participant selection criteria, Tinel’s test performance, electrodiagnostic criteria, and diagnostic thresholds. Conclusions: Tinel’s test demonstrated variable diagnostic accuracy in CTS. Due to poor methodological quality and high variability among the studies, more DTA studies are necessary. PROSPERO Protocol number: CRD42020218165 dated 27 November 2020.en
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.extent3828260
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Therapy Reviews
dc.subjectCarpal tunnel syndrome
dc.subjectTinel’s test
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy
dc.subjectmedian nerve
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
dc.subjectOrthopedics and Sports Medicine
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleDiagnostic test accuracy of Tinel’s test in adults with carpal tunnel syndrome—a systematic reviewen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2025-10-09
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206099193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/10833196.2024.2411178
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record