Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaws, Keith
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-10T11:15:01Z
dc.date.available2025-01-10T11:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLaws , K & O'Brien , E 2025 , ' Decluttering Minds: Psychological interventions for hoarding disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysis ' , Journal of Psychiatric Research , vol. 181 , pp. 738-751 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.029
dc.identifier.issn0022-3956
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-5065-0867/work/175471167
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/28671
dc.description© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractBackground Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is conventionally considered the primary intervention for Hoarding Disorder (HD), yet various psychological interventions have recently emerged. This study, pre-registered at Prospero (CRD42023427534), aims to comprehensively assess a range of psychological interventions, including CBT, for reducing HD symptomatology. Methods A systematic literature search using PubMed and SCOPUS identified 41 eligible studies comprising 47 samples (N = 1343). Risk of bias for RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and methodological quality for all studies was evaluated using the Psychotherapy Outcome Study Methodology Rating Form (POMRF). Results Pre-post effects revealed a large reduction in HD symptomatology (g = −1.09), sustained at follow-up in 18 studies (g = −1.12, N = 588). Additionally, 8 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) demonstrated a substantial end-of-trial reduction in HD symptoms compared to controls (g = −0.75). Meta-regression found no moderating effects for: demographics, medication use, number of treatment sessions, or study quality. Similarly, no differences were observed between group and individual therapy, therapy with or without home visits, or CBT versus other psychological interventions. Conclusion This study confirms psychological therapies are effective in reducing hoarding symptoms, while indicating no superiority for CBT. Despite the benefits, symptoms often persist above the clinical cut-off for HD, highlighting the enduring clinical challenges in achieving symptomatic remission. The findings underscore the need to address methodological limitations and possible age and gender bias in future research to enhance the efficacy and inclusivity of psychological interventions for HD.en
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent9423173
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychiatric Research
dc.subjectHoarding
dc.subjectOCD
dc.subjectPsychological Therapies
dc.subjectAcceptance and commitment therapy
dc.subjectCBT
dc.subjectCognitive behavioural therapy
dc.subjectPsychological interventions
dc.subjectExposure therapy
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Mental health
dc.subjectBiological Psychiatry
dc.titleDecluttering Minds: Psychological interventions for hoarding disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sports
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionCognitive Neuropsychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213843659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.029
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record