| dc.contributor.author | Larvor, B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-25T16:09:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-03-25T16:09:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Larvor , B 1997 , ' Lakatos as historian of mathematics ' , Philosophia Mathematica , vol. 5 , no. 1 , pp. 42-64 . https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/5.1.42 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8019 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 187544 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: a5810854-66f8-41d9-9727-39f40860b2c7 | |
| dc.identifier.other | dspace: 2299/3050 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-0921-1659/work/130151037 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/3050 | |
| dc.description | Original article can be found at: http://philmat.oxfordjournals.org/archive/index.dtl Copyright Oxford University Press DOI: 10.1093/philmat/5.1.42 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA] | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses the connection between the actual history of mathematics and Lakatos's philosophy of mathematics, in three parts. The first points to studies by Lakatos and others which support his conception of mathematics and its history. In the second I suggest that the apparent poverty of Lakatosian examples may be due to the way in which the history of mathematics is usually written. The third part argues that Lakatos is right to hold philosophy accountable to history, even if Lakatos's own view of mathematics fails that test. | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophia Mathematica | |
| dc.title | Lakatos as historian of mathematics | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | Philosophy | |
| dc.contributor.institution | School of Humanities | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
| rioxxterms.versionofrecord | https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/5.1.42 | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
| herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |
