Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodinson, S.
dc.contributor.authorSingleton, J.
dc.identifier.citationGoodinson , S & Singleton , J 1989 , ' Quality of life : a critical review of current concepts, measures and their clinical implications ' , International Journal of Nursing Studies , vol. 26 , no. 4 , pp. 327-341 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 186364
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5ab12105-a7f5-4617-b557-0fbdd526125b
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/3145
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0024812044
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: Copyright Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7489(89)90019-9 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractQuality of life (Q/L) measurements are used to justify or refute different forms of medical treatment; to identify the sequelae of disease or treatment which are resolved by other interventions including nursing and to provide a basis for allocating resources to those treatments judged to be most cost-effective. This paper reviews some of the difficulties in defining and measuring Q/L and the ethical issues raised in relation to their use in allocation of treatment resources. It is suggested that Q/L tests should include a range of dimensions known to contribute to Q/L and that they are applied at different times during the progression of illness and incorporate information obtained from patients. It is essential that weightings by individuals of dimensions investigated in the test are included. Further research is necessary to determine the effects of coping strategies and personality variables on Q/L.en
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
dc.titleQuality of life : a critical review of current concepts, measures and their clinical implicationsen
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record