| dc.contributor.author | Hutto, D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-13T12:15:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-01-13T12:15:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hutto , D 2009 , ' Philosophical clarification, its possibility and point ' , Philosophia , vol. 37 , no. 4 , pp. 629-652 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9196-2 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0048-3893 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 187525 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: ccaa833a-4a0a-4ea0-ac5e-07b38d96adb6 | |
| dc.identifier.other | dspace: 2299/4140 | |
| dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 71449120267 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/4140 | |
| dc.description | “The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com”. Copyright Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s11406-009-9196-2 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA] | |
| dc.description.abstract | It is possible to pursue philosophy with a clarificatory end in mind. Doing philosophy in this mode neither reduces to simply engaging in therapy or theorizing. This paper defends the possibility of this distinctive kind of philosophical activity and gives an account of its product—non-theoretical insights—in an attempt to show that there exists a third, ‘live’ option for understanding what philosophy has to offer. It responds to criticisms leveled at elucidatory philosophy by defenders of extreme therapeutic readings and clearly demonstrates that in rejecting the latter one cannot assume Wittgenstein’s approach to philosophy was theoretically based by default. | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophia | |
| dc.title | Philosophical clarification, its possibility and point | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | Philosophy | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
| rioxxterms.versionofrecord | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9196-2 | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
| herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |
