Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorHerman, R.
dc.contributor.authorNoble, D.
dc.identifier.citationCampbell , F E , Herman , R & Noble , D 2006 , ' Contradictions in “reputation management” ' , Journal of Communication Management , vol. 10 , no. 2 , pp. 191-196 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 120792
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a85adb6d-6caa-42be-aed6-38b17eb37ddf
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4172
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84992993134
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: Copyright Emerald Group Publishing. DOI: 10.1108/13632540610664733 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstract“Reputation management” is widely used as a rationale for public relations, although the public relations practice has problems with its own reputation. Public relations is presented in textbooks as a mature management discipline, yet the term “public relations” is rejected by many practitioners and academics. “Reputation management” may have been introduced to counter negative associations and to gain status for the practice. The purpose of this paper is to use critical theory to question the ideas and assumptions underlying “reputation management” and to examine contradictions within the term.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Communication Management
dc.titleContradictions in “reputation management”en
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Marketing and Enterprise
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record