Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoto, K.
dc.contributor.authorLea, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorDittrich, W.
dc.identifier.citationGoto , K , Lea , S E & Dittrich , W 2002 , ' Discrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeons ' , Animal Cognition , vol. 5 , no. 3 , pp. 119-127 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 190826
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ec2480d7-5109-4d84-bbbe-dbb1f7ef830c
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4467
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0036728779
dc.description“The original publication is available at”. Copyright Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-002-0139-6 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractTwelve pigeons (Columba livia) were trained on a go/no-go schedule to discriminate between two kinds of movement patterns of dots, which to human observers appear to be "intentional" and "non-intentional" movements. In experiment 1, the intentional motion stimulus contained one dot (a "wolf") that moved systematically towards another dot as though stalking it, and three distractors ("sheep"). The non-intentional motion stimulus consisted of four distractors but no stalker. Birds showed some improvement of discrimination as the sessions progressed, but high levels of discrimination were not reached. In experiment 2, the same birds were tested with different stimuli. The same parameters were used but the number of intentionally moving dots in the intentional motion stimulus was altered, so that three wolves stalked one sheep. Despite the enhanced difference of movement patterns, the birds did not show any further improvement in discrimination. However, birds for which the non-intentional stimulus was associated with reward showed a decline in discrimination. These results indicated that pigeons can discriminate between stimuli that do and do not contain an element that human observer see as moving intentionally. However, as no feature-positive effect was found in experiment 1, it is assumed that pigeons did not perceive or discriminate these stimuli on the basis that the intentional stimuli contained a feature that the non-intentional stimuli lacked, though the convergence seen in experiment 2 may have been an effective feature for the pigeons. Pigeons seem to be able to recognise some form of multiple simultaneously goal-directed motions, compared to random motions, as a distinctive feature, but do not seem to use simple "intentional" motion paths of two geometrical figures, embedded in random motions, as a feature whose presence or absence differentiates motion displays.en
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Cognition
dc.titleDiscrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeonsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record