Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaha, B.
dc.contributor.authorSensarma, R.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-20T08:15:57Z
dc.date.available2010-07-20T08:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationSaha , B & Sensarma , R 2004 , ' Divestment and bank competition ' , Journal of Economics , vol. 81 , no. 3 , pp. 223-247 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-003-0025-y
dc.identifier.issn0931-8658
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 81181
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9b59236a-5599-484b-a75c-cd8509667749
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4668
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 1842832062
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/4668
dc.description“The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com”. Copyright Springer
dc.description.abstractWe determine optimal divestment (partial privatization) and entry in banking in the context of a mixed oligopoly. When banks compete in deposits, greater entry is associated with higher divestment. However, social welfare improves with entry only when the private entrants are more efficient than the public bank. Further, when banks compete in interest rates with differentiated products, the public banks behavior resembles that of a price leader and it earns less profit than the private bank, if government holding in the public bank is sufficiently high. Competition becomes excessive in this case, and social welfare maximization requires greater divestment.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economics
dc.titleDivestment and bank competitionen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-003-0025-y
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record