Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGilhooly, K.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, P.
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-19T16:25:57Z
dc.date.available2011-01-19T16:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationGilhooly , K & Murphy , P 2005 , ' Differentiating insight from non-insight problems ' , Thinking and Reasoning , vol. 11 , no. 3 , pp. 279-302 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000187
dc.identifier.issn1354-6783
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 194726
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 05d4fd3b-1746-43bd-a446-2101c57090fe
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/5188
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 23844519390
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/5188
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713685607 Copyright Informa / Taylor and Francis Group [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate whether a range of tasks that have been generally classed as requiring insight form an empirically separable group of tasks distinct from tasks generally classed as non-insight. In this study, 24 insight tasks, 10 non-insight tasks, and tests of individual differences in cognitive abilities and working memory were administered to 60 participants. Cluster analysis of the problem-solving tasks indicated that the presumed insight problems did tend to cluster with other presumed insight problems, and similarly the presumed non-insight problems tended to cluster with other presumed non-insight tasks. Performance on presumed insight problems was particularly linked to measures of ideational flexibility with a different pattern of results for the non-insight tasks. Spatial insight problems were linked to spatial flexibility and verbal insight tasks were linked to vocabulary scores. The results are discussed in relation to recent developments of dual process theories of thinking.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThinking and Reasoning
dc.titleDifferentiating insight from non-insight problemsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000187
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record