Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowell, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorMcCauley, C.
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-30T11:37:13Z
dc.date.available2007-08-30T11:37:13Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationPowell , S D & McCauley , C 2003 , ' The Process Of Examining Research Degrees: Some Issues Of Quality ' , Quality Assurance in Education , vol. 11 , no. 2 , pp. 73-84 . https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471498
dc.identifier.issn0968-4883
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 107154
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 74cabcb8-9901-4feb-87c4-f9eba9da6da8
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/525
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84986105162
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/525
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the findings of a small survey of the views of individual academics in relation to four issues regarding research degree examiners: the use of their reports, the scope of criteria they use to make judgements and the assessment remit given to them, their training and the criteria used for their appointment. The responses indicate lack of consensus on almost all points and suggest some fundamental differences of view on the nature of research degree study, its subsequent examination and on the roles of examiners within the assessment process.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofQuality Assurance in Education
dc.rightsOpen
dc.titleThe Process Of Examining Research Degrees: Some Issues Of Qualityen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Education
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Education
dcterms.dateAccepted2003
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471498
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record