Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStacey, R.
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-03T09:18:52Z
dc.date.available2007-09-03T09:18:52Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationStacey , R 2001 , ' What can it mean to say that the individual is social through and through ' , Group Analysis , vol. 34 , no. 4 , pp. 457-473 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0533316401344005
dc.identifier.issn0533-3164
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 83020
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 637f7465-9827-49da-95eb-8d22b4d759f2
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/541
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 0035696043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/541
dc.descriptionThe final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Group Analysis, Vol 34 / Issue 4, 2001, Copyright The Group-Analytic Society, by SAGE Publications Ltd at : http://gaq.sagepub.com/
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores different ways of thinking about the group-analytic concept of the individual as social through and through. One explanation is based on object relations theory and regards the individual as social because the individual psyche is an ‘internal world’ of representations of social relationships. The paper argues that this represents a Kantian ‘both / and’ way of thinking. Another approach is based on Mead and this suggests that the individual is social trhough and through because individual mind is the same process of bodily action as the social. This represents a dialectical mode of thinking derived from Hegel.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGroup Analysis
dc.titleWhat can it mean to say that the individual is social through and throughen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.school
dcterms.dateAccepted2001
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0533316401344005
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record