Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlexander, K.S.
dc.contributor.authorStott, D.
dc.contributor.authorSivakumar, B.
dc.contributor.authorKang, N.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-17T12:20:47Z
dc.date.available2011-03-17T12:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationAlexander , K S , Stott , D , Sivakumar , B & Kang , N 2010 , ' A morphometric study of the human ear ' , Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery , vol. 64 , no. 1 , pp. 41-47 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.005
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 116498
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c737eb54-10ee-4abf-bd1a-81a0a5be0fea
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/5487
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 79751527187
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/5487
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Copyright Elsevier [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractAims: We examined variations in the shape of the human ear according to age, sex and ethnic group with particular attention to ear prominence. Methods: 420 volunteers were recruited. Measurements included; head height and length, ear height and axis, antihelix taken off angle, earlobe length and width, ear width at the helical root and tragus. Prominence was measured at the helical root and tragus (conchomastoid angle, conchal bowl depth and helical–mastoid distance). Results: Good symmetry was shown for all measurements. Ethnically Indian volunteers had the largest ears (both length and width), followed by Caucasians, and Afro-Caribbeans. This trend was significant in males (p < 0.001), but not significant in females (p = 0.087). Ears increased in size throughout life. Subjectively, only 2% of volunteers felt their ears were prominent compared to 10% in the opinion of the principal investigator. No objective measurements were identified that accurately predicted subjective perceptions of prominence. Conclusions: We found consistent trends in ear morphology depending on ethnic group, age and sex. Our study was unable to define an objective method for assessing ear prominence. Decisions about what constitutes a prominent ear should be left to personal and aesthetic choice.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
dc.subjectear morphometry
dc.subjectear ethnic variation
dc.subjectear sex variation
dc.subjectear prominence
dc.titleA morphometric study of the human earen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Allied Health Professions and Midwifery
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.005
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record