University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UHRABy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

        Arkivum Files

        My Downloads
        View Item 
        • UHRA Home
        • University of Hertfordshire
        • Research publications
        • View Item
        • UHRA Home
        • University of Hertfordshire
        • Research publications
        • View Item

        Unawareness of deficit in acute stroke : Neuropsychological therapy matters

        View/Open
        905173.pdf (PDF, 102Kb)
        Author
        Fotopoulou, A.
        Jenkinson, P.
        Attention
        2299/5581
        Abstract
        Motor deficiency is the leading cause of disability following stroke and the main target of neurorehabilitation. However, the co-occurrence of certain cognitive deficits, such as unawareness (lack of insight into one’s stroke-induced symptoms) may impede rehabilitation and lead to poor functional outcome.1 Such patients are unaware of their rehabilitation needs and thus fail to comply with and benefit from interventions. Unawareness following stroke varies in severity, may concern different functional domains, or be specific to a given deficit (i.e. patients may fail to acknowledge one symptom [paralysis], but recognise another [memory problems]). A prototypical form of unawareness is ‘anosognosia for hemiplegia’ (AHP); the apparent inability to understand or acknowledge contralesional paralysis. Patients may falsely claim that they moved their paralysed limbs in front of the examiner, despite blatant evidence to the contrary. Some patients even attempt to get out of bed or engage in other activities that are clearly hazardous.2 AHP is commonly associated with righthemisphere lesions, although its occurrence after left-hemisphere strokes should not be ignored.3 AHP is reported to range from 33 to 58% of stroke victims, and persistent AHP may range from 10 to 17%.2 Sometimes these patients make comments that suggest partial or tacit awareness into their deficits4 and hence some clinicians or carers may believe that they are malingering or being ‘difficult’. However, these patients typically have genuine (neurologically-induced) unawareness and may even falsely ‘experience’ their limbs moving.
        Publication date
        2010
        Published in
        Stroke Matters
        Other links
        http://hdl.handle.net/2299/5581
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Keep in touch

        © 2019 University of Hertfordshire

        I want to...

        • Apply for a course
        • Download a Prospectus
        • Find a job at the University
        • Make a complaint
        • Contact the Press Office

        Go to...

        • Accommodation booking
        • Your student record
        • Bayfordbury
        • KASPAR
        • UH Arts

        The small print

        • Terms of use
        • Privacy and cookies
        • Criminal Finances Act 2017
        • Modern Slavery Act 2015
        • Sitemap

        Find/Contact us

        • T: +44 (0)1707 284000
        • E: ask@herts.ac.uk
        • Where to find us
        • Parking
        • hr
        • qaa
        • stonewall
        • AMBA
        • ECU Race Charter
        • disability confident
        • AthenaSwan