Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaddeo, M.
dc.contributor.authorFloridi, L.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-26T08:34:57Z
dc.date.available2011-04-26T08:34:57Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationTaddeo , M & Floridi , L 2010 , ' The case for e-trust ' , Ethics and Information Technology , vol. 3 , no. 1 , pp. 1-3 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9263-1
dc.identifier.issn1388-1957
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 186613
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3bfd0f1c-053c-4e09-9315-4a5976c3d510
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/5737
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 78650965324
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/5737
dc.description“The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com”. Copyright Springer [Full text of this editorial is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractTrust is generally understood as a relationship in which an agent (the trustor) decides to depend on another agent’s (the trustee) foreseeable behaviour in order to fulfil his expectations. It is a fundamental aspect of social interactions, as it has economical, social, psychological and ethical implications, and as such it is a crucial topic in several research areas (Gambetta 1998; Taddeo 2009). In the past decade, research interest in trust-related concepts and phenomena has escalated following the advent of the information revolution (Floridi 2008). The use of Information and Communication Technologies, of Computer Mediated Communications (CMCs), and the development of artificial agents—such as SatNav systems, drones, and robotic companion—have provided unprecedented opportunities for social interactions in informational environments, involving human as well as artificial and hybrid agents (Ess 2010). In such scenario, one of the most problematic issues is represented by the emergence of etrust, that is, trust specifically developed in digital contexts and/or involving artificial agents. Like trust, e-trust too has a variety of heterogeneous implications, ranging from the effects on social interactions in digital environment to the behaviour of the involved agents, whether human or artificial (Taddeo 2009; Ess 2010).en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEthics and Information Technology
dc.titleThe case for e-trusten
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9263-1
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record