University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UHRABy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

        Arkivum Files

        My Downloads
        View Item 
        • UHRA Home
        • University of Hertfordshire
        • Research publications
        • View Item
        • UHRA Home
        • University of Hertfordshire
        • Research publications
        • View Item

        Commercial software upgrades may significantly alter Perfusion CT parameter values in colorectal cancer

        Author
        Goh, V.
        Shastry, M.
        Engledow, A.
        Reston, J.
        Peck, J.
        Endozo, R.
        Rodriguez-Justo, M.
        Taylor, S.A.
        Halligan, S.
        Attention
        2299/5785
        Abstract
        Objective : To determine how commercial software platform upgrades impact on derived parameters for colorectal cancer. Materials and methods Following ethical approval, 30 patients with suspected colorectal cancer underwent Perfusion CT using integrated 64 detector PET/CT before surgery. Analysis was performed using software based on modified distributed parameter analysis (Perfusion software version 4; Perfusion 4.0), then repeated using the previous version (Perfusion software version 3; Perfusion 3.0). Tumour blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT) and permeability surface area product (PS) were determined for identical regions-of-interest. Slice-by-slice and ‘whole tumour’ variance was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Results : Mean BF, BV and PS was 20.4%, 59.5%, and 106% higher, and MTT 14.3% shorter for Perfusion 4.0 than Perfusion 3.0. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) were +13.5 (−44.9 to 72.0), +2.61 (−0.06 to 5.28), −1.23 (−6.83 to 4.36), and +14.2 (−4.43 to 32.8) for BF, BV, MTT and PS respectively. Within subject coefficient of variation was 36.6%, 38.0%, 27.4% and 60.6% for BF, BV, MTT and PS respectively indicating moderate to poor agreement. Conclusion : Software version upgrades of the same software platform may result in significantly different parameter values, requiring adjustments for cross-version comparison.
        Publication date
        2010
        Published in
        European Radiology
        Published version
        https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1967-4
        Other links
        http://hdl.handle.net/2299/5785
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Keep in touch

        © 2019 University of Hertfordshire

        I want to...

        • Apply for a course
        • Download a Prospectus
        • Find a job at the University
        • Make a complaint
        • Contact the Press Office

        Go to...

        • Accommodation booking
        • Your student record
        • Bayfordbury
        • KASPAR
        • UH Arts

        The small print

        • Terms of use
        • Privacy and cookies
        • Criminal Finances Act 2017
        • Modern Slavery Act 2015
        • Sitemap

        Find/Contact us

        • T: +44 (0)1707 284000
        • E: ask@herts.ac.uk
        • Where to find us
        • Parking
        • hr
        • qaa
        • stonewall
        • AMBA
        • ECU Race Charter
        • disability confident
        • AthenaSwan