Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodohan, Eamonn Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-31T14:47:59Z
dc.date.available2011-05-31T14:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/5873
dc.description.abstractObjective: Criminal liability for the sexual-transmission of HIV raises complex questions for both clinicians and service-users regarding their responsibilities and legal obligations to disclose information to others. This is the first research study to address the impact of these issues upon everyday clinical and professional management in the UK. The prevalence and incidence of clinical and HIV-legal issues reported by the 107 psychologists sampled are reported. Design: A cross-sectional approach comprising two components was utilised: Firstly, questionnaire survey (Response rate 22%) scoping the experiences of practice issues among psychologists from sexual-health and generic settings. Attitudes towards HIV-prosecutions and various measures of professional self-efficacy were also collected. Secondly, three focus groups (N=15) exploring the impact of practice issues upon clinicians’ likely confidentiality breaking behaviours. Methods: Clinical and legal issues are presented. Further statistical analyses explored the interaction of various demographic, clinical and attitudinal variables upon clinician’s perceived self-efficacy. Focus Group transcripts analysed using Thematic Analysis (Data-driven approach) with eight emergent themes. Results: Although no direct involvements in police investigations reported, two instances of psychology notes being subpoenaed plus multiple ‘near miss’ clinical experiences described. High proportions of sexual-health psychologists experienced HIV-clients disclosing problematic behaviours, including intentional transmission (9%; N=5) and/or ‘reckless’ behaviour (72%). Focus groups expressed high levels of anxiety regarding these scenarios associated to multiple influences (interpersonal, clinician, professional and service factors). Quantitative and qualitative results were triangulated to provide a detailed analysis of how psychologists manage the clinical impact of the issues. Conclusions: Psychologists broadly supported HIV-prosecutions for intentional transmission (81%) but only limited support around ‘reckless’ cases (44%), particularly among those sexual-health experienced. Those ‘critical’ attempted to mitigate the impact of legal issues by proactively raising awareness among HIV-clients and resisting overly-defensive service changes; whereas those ‘less-critical’ were more accepting. Clinical, training and therapeutic implications are briefly considered.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectclinical psychologyen_US
dc.subjectconfidentialityen_US
dc.subjectHIV/AIDSen_US
dc.subjectHIV transmissionen_US
dc.subjectcriminal liabilityen_US
dc.subjectHIV infectionen_US
dc.subjectclinical practiceen_US
dc.subjectlegal issuesen_US
dc.subjectsexual healthen_US
dc.subjectprosecutionen_US
dc.subjectprofessional issuesen_US
dc.subjectprofessional guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectreckless behaviouren_US
dc.subjectthematic analysisen_US
dc.subjectfocus groupsen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjectduty of careen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectself efficacyen_US
dc.subjectbiological GBHen_US
dc.subjectconfidentiality breachen_US
dc.titleCriminalisation for Sexual Transmission of HIV: Emerging Issues and the Impact Upon Clinical Psychology Practice in the UKen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record