Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHutto, D.
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-20T08:47:42Z
dc.date.available2011-06-20T08:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationIn : Radical Enactivism : Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative; Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto, edited by Menary, R., pp.13-38en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-9027241511
dc.identifier.isbn9027241511
dc.identifier.other905531
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/6014
dc.descriptionFull text of this book is not available in the UHRAen_US
dc.description.abstractPhilosophically speaking, emotions are a nuisance, even the good ones. There are several reasons for this. First, it is thought that they are a hangover of our animal natures that interfere with our rationality : they gum up our reasoning. This verdict has been familiar since the time of Greek philosophy, which is no doubt why being a cognitive scientists appears a respectable occupation, but being an ‘emotive scientist’ sounds like a blemish on one’s capacity for professional judgement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesConsciousness and Emotion Book Series;
dc.titleUnprincipled engagements : emotional experience, expression and response.en_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record