Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKornbrot, D.
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T14:01:22Z
dc.date.available2011-08-08T14:01:22Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.citationKornbrot , D 1988 , ' Random walk models of binary choice : the effect of deadlines in the presence of assymetric payoffs ' , Acta Psychologica , vol. 69 , no. 2 , pp. 109-127 . https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(88)90002-9
dc.identifier.issn0001-6918
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 194120
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a29bfa45-13ad-4f18-886a-16fe31ebc0f3
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/3580
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 38249027886
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/6066
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at : http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Copyright Elsevier [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractRandom walk models of binary choice were evaluated using line length discrimination tasks of varying difficulty. Subjects' gained monetary payoffs when their responses were correct and lost when their responses were incorrect, or exceeded a prescribed deadline. The payoff structure heavily favoured one response. Mean latency for each stimulus was a linear function of information acquired for that stimulus, with the same residual motor time for favoured and unfavoured stimuli; supporting a random walk model in discrete time. For all levels of difficulty, responses given in error were never slower than the same responses given correctly. The difference between correct and error mean response times were independent of distance to the random walk boundaries; supporting a modified form of the sequential probability ratio test model and contradicting the predictions of relative judgment theory. Rate of gain of stimulus information per unit time was substantially larger for the unfavoured stimulus in the hard conditions and one easy condition, also contradicting the prediction of relative judgment theory. Subjects' placement of response criteria was neither optimal nor completely predicted by a linear learning model, suggesting a mixed decision strategy.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofActa Psychologica
dc.titleRandom walk models of binary choice : the effect of deadlines in the presence of assymetric payoffsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dcterms.dateAccepted1988
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(88)90002-9
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record