Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Diane
dc.identifier.citationDuncan , D 2010 , ' Rose and primary English : are the shackles really off? ' , Education 3 to 13 , vol. 38 , no. 4 , pp. 353-367 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 394182
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 248178e2-2ae4-4617-a316-9b686f270148
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 79958034674
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at : Copyright Taylor & Francis [Full text of this article can be found in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractThis article offers a critical appraisal of some of the Rose Report's recommendations for the primary English curriculum. It is divided into two parts. The first discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the recommendations whilst raising questions about their potential to bring about urgently needed curriculum renewal. The second is a reflective study of a short, intensive teaching programme recently conducted with a Year 6 class which used a children's story to improve writing performance. Dramatic activities and a progressive model for questioning texts made use of pedagogical strategies which were designed to engage children's enjoyment and motivation whilst also ensuring that developmental gains were made in spoken language, thinking and writing. The head teacher who initiated the project had already embarked on a series of new approaches to the curriculum which happened to coincide with Rose's recommendations to make greater use of spoken language and drama in reading and writing development. It is suggested that such approaches can make a strong impact upon children's learning across several areas. However, what is left unresolved is the question of whether high stakes testing and literacy prescriptions will continue to inhibit the real potential which exists for curriculum change.en
dc.relation.ispartofEducation 3 to 13
dc.subjectpedagogical strategies
dc.subjectprimary English
dc.subjectRose Review
dc.subjectspoken language
dc.subjectwriting development
dc.titleRose and primary English : are the shackles really off?en
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Education
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record