dc.contributor.author | Haralambous, Nicola | |
dc.contributor.author | Monaghan, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-03T14:01:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-03T14:01:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Haralambous , N & Monaghan , C 2010 , ' Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering ' , Criminal Bar Quarterly , no. 1 , pp. 10-11 . < http://www.criminalbar.com/ > | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/7536 | |
dc.description | Original article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA] | |
dc.description.abstract | For the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Criminal Bar Quarterly | |
dc.title | Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.institution | Hertfordshire Law School | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.criminalbar.com/ | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |