Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaralambous, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorMonaghan, C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-03T14:01:02Z
dc.date.available2012-01-03T14:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationHaralambous , N & Monaghan , C 2010 , ' Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering ' , Criminal Bar Quarterly , no. 1 , pp. 10-11 . < http://www.criminalbar.com/ >
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 347820
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e2cf558e-e78f-4414-b1cf-1b1d03e42f5e
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/7536
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
dc.description.abstractFor the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCriminal Bar Quarterly
dc.titleTwelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tamperingen
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.criminalbar.com/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record