Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAppleton, Jane
dc.contributor.authorCaan, Woody
dc.contributor.authorCowley, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorKendall, S.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-03T14:01:10Z
dc.date.available2012-01-03T14:01:10Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationAppleton , J , Caan , W , Cowley , S & Kendall , S 2007 , ' Busting the bureaucracy: lessons from research governance in primary care ' , Community Practitioner , vol. 80 , no. 2 , pp. 29-32 . < http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cp/cp >
dc.identifier.issn1462-2815
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 381964
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d6f7f7f7-468d-42c8-8c2a-92a488c603ff
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 17330671
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 34047211781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/7542
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a critical discussion of the research governance approval processes faced in a nationally-funded primary care health service survey. The study is investigating how a range of English primary care organisations are addressing child protection and safeguarding children responsibilities in the light of a wealth of policy directives following publication of the report of Lord Laming's inquiry into the death of Victoria Climbié in 2003. The principal investigator is a member of a local research ethics committee and has a good working knowledge of the Research Governance Framework. However, following multi-centre research ethics committee approval, a whole catalogue of difficulties emerged in gaining research governance approval for this study from primary care organisations. These challenges and our lessons for primary care are outlined in an organisational case study with the intention of generating debate around this fundamental stage in the research process. With the current restructuring of primary care, we believe the time is right to streamline research governance procedures.en
dc.format.extent4
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Practitioner
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectChild Advocacy
dc.subjectDecision Making, Organizational
dc.subjectDocumentation
dc.subjectEthics Committees, Research
dc.subjectGreat Britain
dc.subjectGuidelines as Topic
dc.subjectHealth Care Reform
dc.subjectHealth Services Needs and Demand
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMulticenter Studies as Topic
dc.subjectNursing Research
dc.subjectOrganizational Case Studies
dc.subjectOrganizational Innovation
dc.subjectOrganizational Policy
dc.subjectPeer Review, Research
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectResearch Support as Topic
dc.subjectState Medicine
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.titleBusting the bureaucracy: lessons from research governance in primary careen
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCommunities, Young People and Family Lives
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cp/cp
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record