Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHodgson, G.M.
dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, T.
dc.identifier.citationHodgson , G M & Knudsen , T 2012 , ' Agreeing on generalised Darwinism : A response to Pavel Pelikan ' , Journal of Evolutionary Economics , vol. 22 , no. 1 , pp. 9-18 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 511164
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 82624b44-6ec6-463e-855f-80cb710627df
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84855344314
dc.descriptionCopyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractPelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evolutionary Economics
dc.titleAgreeing on generalised Darwinism : A response to Pavel Pelikanen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Accounting, Finance and Economics
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionGroup for Research in Organisational Evolution
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research on Management, Economy and Society
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record