Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuplissy, J.
dc.contributor.authorGysel, M.
dc.contributor.authorSjogren, S.
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, N.
dc.contributor.authorGood, N.
dc.contributor.authorKammermann, L.
dc.contributor.authorMichaud, V.
dc.contributor.authorWeigel, R.
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, S. Martins
dc.contributor.authorGruening, C.
dc.contributor.authorVillani, P.
dc.contributor.authorLaj, P.
dc.contributor.authorSellegri, K.
dc.contributor.authorMetzger, A.
dc.contributor.authorMcFiggans, G. B.
dc.contributor.authorWehrle, G.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, R.
dc.contributor.authorDommen, J.
dc.contributor.authorRistovski, Z.
dc.contributor.authorBaltensperger, U.
dc.contributor.authorWeingartner, E.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T09:01:17Z
dc.date.available2012-01-26T09:01:17Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationDuplissy , J , Gysel , M , Sjogren , S , Meyer , N , Good , N , Kammermann , L , Michaud , V , Weigel , R , dos Santos , S M , Gruening , C , Villani , P , Laj , P , Sellegri , K , Metzger , A , McFiggans , G B , Wehrle , G , Richter , R , Dommen , J , Ristovski , Z , Baltensperger , U & Weingartner , E 2009 , ' Intercomparison study of six HTDMAs : results and recommendations ' , Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , vol. 2 , no. 2 , pp. 363-378 . https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-363-2009
dc.identifier.issn1867-1381
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/7725
dc.description.abstractWe report on an intercomparison of six different hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analysers (HTDMAs). These HTDMAs are used worldwide in laboratory experiments and field campaigns to measure the water uptake of aerosol particles and have never been intercompared. After an investigation of the different design of the instruments with their advantages and inconveniencies, the methods for calibration, validation and data analysis are presented. Measurements of nebulised ammonium sulphate as well as of secondary organic aerosol generated from a smog chamber were performed. Agreement and discrepancies between the instruments and to the theory are discussed, and final recommendations for a standard instrument are given, as a benchmark for laboratory or field experiments to ensure a high quality of HTDMA data.en
dc.format.extent16
dc.format.extent685215
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
dc.subjectAEROSOL
dc.subjectHYGROSCOPIC GROWTH
dc.subjectATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL
dc.subjectH-TDMA
dc.subjectVOLATILE PROPERTIES
dc.subjectGROWTH MEASUREMENTS
dc.subjectRELATIVE-HUMIDITY
dc.subjectAMMONIUM-SULFATE
dc.subjectLOW-TEMPERATURES
dc.subjectTANDEM DMA
dc.titleIntercomparison study of six HTDMAs : results and recommendationsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.5194/amt-2-363-2009
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record