dc.contributor.author | Bourne, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-29T12:00:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-29T12:00:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bourne , C 2004 , ' Future Contingents, Non-Contradiction and the Law of Excluded Middle Muddle ' , Analysis , vol. 64 , no. 282 , pp. 122-128 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2004.00471.x | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2638 | |
dc.identifier.other | dspace: 2299/4933 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-4980-8911/work/32558784 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/8107 | |
dc.description | Original article can be found at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ | |
dc.description.abstract | I show how to hold the view that future contingents are not either true or false without having to reject either the law of excluded middle or the law of non-contradiction. This is achieved without resorting to non-truth-conditional logical connectives. In these ways it improves on the approaches taken by Lukasiewicz and Tooley. | en |
dc.format.extent | 264585 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Analysis | |
dc.subject | future | |
dc.subject | contingent | |
dc.subject | excluded middle | |
dc.subject | non-contradiction | |
dc.subject | Aristotle | |
dc.subject | Lukasiewicz | |
dc.subject | Tooley | |
dc.subject | negation | |
dc.subject | non-classical logic | |
dc.subject | bivalence | |
dc.title | Future Contingents, Non-Contradiction and the Law of Excluded Middle Muddle | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Philosophy | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2004.00471.x | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |