Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamon, Shulamit
dc.contributor.authorHealy, B.
dc.contributor.authorRenouf, N.
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-25T08:57:41Z
dc.date.available2012-04-25T08:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2007-03-01
dc.identifier.citationRamon , S , Healy , B & Renouf , N 2007 , ' Recovery from mental illness as an emergent concept and practice in Australia and the UK ' , International Journal of Social Psychiatry , vol. 53 , no. 2 , pp. 108-122 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006075018
dc.identifier.issn0020-7640
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 731382
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ad915126-9724-415e-8d7c-c1c1c8836d24
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 33847774771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/8419
dc.descriptionMEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.
dc.description.abstractThe language of recovery is now widely used in mental health policy, services, and research. Yet the term has disparate antecedents, and is used in a variety of ways. Some of the history of the use of the term recovery is surveyed, with particular attention to the new meaning of the term, especially as identified by service users, supported and taken up to various degrees by research and in the professional literature. Policy and practice in two countries - Australia and the United Kingdom - are examined to determine the manner and extent to which the concept of recovery is evident. In its new meaning, the concept of recovery has the potential to bring about profound and needed changes in mental health theory and practice. It is being taken up differently in different settings. It is clear that - at least in Australia and the United Kingdom - there are promising new recovery models and practices that support recovery, but the widespread use of recovery language is not enough to ensure that the core principles of the recovery model are implemented.en
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry
dc.titleRecovery from mental illness as an emergent concept and practice in Australia and the UKen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Work, Mental Health and Learning Disabilities
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847774771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006075018
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record