Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sairah
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Vicky
dc.contributor.authorTam, Emily
dc.contributor.authorWellsted, D.
dc.contributor.authorHalligan, Steve
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-30T12:03:54Z
dc.date.available2012-05-30T12:03:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationKhan , S , Goh , V , Tam , E , Wellsted , D & Halligan , S 2012 , ' Perfusion CT assessment of the colon and rectum : Feasibility of quantification of bowel wall perfusion and vascularization ' , European Journal of Radiology , vol. 81 , no. 5 , pp. 821-824 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.033
dc.identifier.issn1872-7727
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2895-7838/work/31148140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/8673
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractThe aim was to determine the feasibility of vascular quantification of the bowel wall for different anatomical segments of the colorectum. Following institutional ethical approval and informed consent, 39 patients with colorectal cancer underwent perfusion CT. Blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT), and permeability surface area product (PS) were assessed for different segments of the colorectum: ascending, transverse, descending colon, sigmoid, or rectum, that were distant from the tumor, and which were proven normal on contemporary colonoscopy, and subsequent imaging and clinical follow up. Mean (SD) for BF, BV, MTT and PS for the different anatomical colorectal segments were obtained and compared using a pooled t-test. Significance was at 5%. Assessment was not possible in 9 of 39 (23%) patients as the bowel wall was ≤5mm precluding quantitative analysis. Forty-four segments were evaluated in the remaining 30 patients. Mean BF was higher in the proximal than distal colon: 24.0 versus 17.8mL/min/100g tissue; p=0.009; BV, MTT and PS were not significantly different; BV: 3.46 versus 3.15mL/100g tissue, p=0.45; MTT: 15.1 versus 18.3s; p=0.10; PS: 6.84 versus 8.97mL/min/100 tissue, p=0.13, respectively. In conclusion, assessment of bowel wall perfusion may fail in 23% of patients. The colorectum demonstrates segmental differences in perfusion.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Radiology
dc.titlePerfusion CT assessment of the colon and rectum : Feasibility of quantification of bowel wall perfusion and vascularizationen
dc.contributor.institutionScience Learning Centre
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionHealth Research Methods Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sports
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology and NeuroDiversity Applied Research Unit
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.033
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record