Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCastle, Nick
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Yugan
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Neil
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-12T12:29:41Z
dc.date.available2012-12-12T12:29:41Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationCastle , N , Pillay , Y & Spencer , N 2011 , ' Comparison of six different intubation aids for use while wearing CBRN-PPE : A manikin study ' , Resuscitation , vol. 82 , no. 12 , pp. 1548-1552 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.020
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 306758
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 88d54789-605f-464a-9bf5-77cffee1f8b2
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 21763057
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 80855148176
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/9377
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Respiratory failure following chemical exposure can be fatal and although supraglottic airway devices have been evaluated for use in the management of CBRN casualties' intubation remains the gold standard airway. METHODS: This is a randomised cross-over study involving 66 paramedic students utilising the following intubating aids bougie, stylet, McCoy laryngoscope, Airtraq™, intubating laryngeal mask (ILMA) and standard intubation. Each participant performed intubation with each device while wearing standard uniform and CBRN-PPE. RESULTS: While wearing standard uniform all intubation aids, except the Airtraq™, resulted in at least a 90% successful intubation rate by 60s. The use of CBRN-PPE led to significantly longer intubation times (ranging from 14.3 to 20.7s) depending on intubation aid used (p < 0.001) with a 90% successful intubation rate not being achieved by all devices even by 150 s. While wearing CBRN-PPE standard intubation and intubation with a stylet were the fastest whereas the ILMA was deemed the easiest to use with the highest success rate. A marked deterioration in the number of intubation attempts completed within 30 s was also noted with standard intubation deteriorating by 82%, stylet deteriorating by 96% and the McCoy by 100%. The deterioration in intubation success at 60 s was less marked. Conclusion: In this manikin-based study all intubation aids evaluated while wearing CBRN-PPE were adversely affected by the loss of dexterity associated with wearing Butyl gloves. Standard intubation and intubation utilising a stylet resulted in the fastest intubation times; whereas the ILMA offers the highest intubation success rate and was deemed to be the easiest intubating aid to use. An important consideration with regards future research is the impact of a learning curve with regards to different intubation aids and whether preassembling all the intubation aids prior to the intubation attempt may improve intubation speed. The impact of intubator familiarity with regards to individual intubation aids is also an important consideration but established intubation aids like the Bougie are more difficult to use when dexterity is reduced due to CBRN-PPE.en
dc.format.extent5
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofResuscitation
dc.subjectairway
dc.subjectCBRN
dc.subjectparamedic
dc.titleComparison of six different intubation aids for use while wearing CBRN-PPE : A manikin studyen
dc.contributor.institutionStatistical Services Consulting Unit
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionHealth Services and Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research on Management, Economy and Society
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Marketing and Enterprise
dc.contributor.institutionLearning in Business Research Unit
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.020
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record