Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChemel, C.
dc.contributor.authorSokhi, R.S.
dc.contributor.authorYu, Y.
dc.contributor.authorHayman, G.D.
dc.contributor.authorVincent, K.J.
dc.contributor.authorDore, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorTang, Y.S.
dc.contributor.authorPrain, H.D.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, B.
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T11:29:34Z
dc.date.available2012-12-19T11:29:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationChemel , C , Sokhi , R S , Yu , Y , Hayman , G D , Vincent , K J , Dore , A J , Tang , Y S , Prain , H D & Fisher , B 2010 , ' Evaluation of a CMAQ simulation at high resolution over the UK for the calendar year 2003 ' , Atmospheric Environment , vol. 44 , no. 24 , pp. 2927-2939 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.029
dc.identifier.issn1352-2310
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 177342
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3d9f414e-18ef-41dd-a535-b6e0e6200670
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/4636
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 77953960877
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/9459
dc.description.abstractA comprehensive ‘operational’ evaluation of the performance of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modelling system version 4.6 was conducted in support of pollution assessment in the UK for the calendar year 2003. The model was run on multiple grids using one-way nests down to a horizontal resolution as fine as 5 km over the whole of the UK. The model performance was evaluated for pollutants with standards and limit values (e.g. O3, PM10) and species contributing to acidic and nitrogenous deposition (e.g. NH3, SO42–, NO3–, NH4+) against data from operational national monitoring networks. The key performance characteristics of the modelling system were found to be variable according to acceptance criteria and to depend on the type (e.g. urban, rural) and location of the sites, as well as on the time of the year. As regards the techniques that were used for ‘operational’ evaluation, performance generally complied with expected levels and ranged from good (e.g. O3, SO42–) to moderate (e.g. PM10, NO3–). At a few sites low correlations and large standard deviations for some species (e.g. SO2) suggest that these sites are subject to local factors (e.g. topography, emission sources) that are not well described in the model. Overall, the model tends to over predict O3 and under predict aerosol species (except SO42–). Discrepancies between predicted and observed concentrations may be due to a variety of intertwined factors, which include inaccuracies in meteorological predictions, chemical boundary conditions, temporal variability in emissions, and uncertainties in the treatment of gas and aerosol chemistry. Further work is thus required to investigate the respective contributions of such factors on the predicted concentrations.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Environment
dc.rightsOpen
dc.titleEvaluation of a CMAQ simulation at high resolution over the UK for the calendar year 2003en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Atmospheric and Climate Physics Research
dc.contributor.institutionAtmospheric Dynamics & Air Quality
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
dcterms.dateAccepted2010
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.029
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record