Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLarvor, B.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-08T17:29:17Z
dc.date.available2013-01-08T17:29:17Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.citationLarvor , B 2010 , ' Frankfurt counter-example defused ' , Analysis , vol. 70 , no. 3 , pp. 506-508 . https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anq038
dc.identifier.issn0003-2638
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 395927
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 913d334c-0865-409d-ab3f-9eafc80fcc14
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000280363200017
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 77954393945
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/9517
dc.description"This is a pre-copy-editing, author produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Analysis following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Larvor, B. (2010) 'Frankfurt counter-example defused.' Analysis 70 (3) pp.506-508 is available online at: http://analysis.oxfordjournals.org/" Copyright the author
dc.description.abstractFrankfurt’s 1969 paper ‘Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility’ purports to refute the principle that a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise. It offers a case in which, Frankfurt claims, the agent is morally responsible even though he could not have done otherwise.en
dc.format.extent3
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnalysis
dc.titleFrankfurt counter-example defuseden
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionSocial Sciences, Arts & Humanities Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anq038
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record