dc.contributor.author | Schulz, Joerg | |
dc.contributor.author | Henderson, S.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sugden, D.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barnett, A.L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-20T12:28:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-20T12:28:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Schulz , J , Henderson , S E , Sugden , D A & Barnett , A L 2011 , ' Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test : factor structure comparisons across three age groups ' , Research in Developmental Disabilities , vol. 32 , no. 4 , pp. 1361-1369 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0891-4222 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/9712 | |
dc.description | Original article can be found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com Copyright Elsevier | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The Movement ABC test is one of the most widely used assessments in the field of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Improvements to the 2nd edition of the test (M-ABC-2) include an extension of the age range and reduction in the number of age bands as well as revision of tasks. The total test score provides a measure of motor performance, which can be used to help make a diagnosis of DCD. M-ABC-2 also provides 3 sub-scales for Manual Dexterity, Aiming and Catching and Balance but the validity of these conceptually derived sub-scales has not previously been reported. Aim: To examine the factor structure of the M-ABC-2 test across the three age bands (AB): AB1 (3-6-year olds), AB2 (7-10-year olds) and AB3 (11-16-year olds). Method: Data from the 2007 standardisation sample (N = 1172) were used in this study. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and structural equation modelling (LISREL 8.8) were employed to explore the relationship between the tasks within each of the 3 age bands. A model trimming approach was used to arrive at a well fitting model. Results: In AB1 a complex factor structure emerged providing evidence for an independent general factor, as well as specific factors representing the 3 test components. In AB2 a final model emerged with four correlated factors, an additional distinction being drawn between static and dynamic balance. In addition, a 2nd order general factor explained a considerable amount of variance in each primary factor. In AB3 CFA supported the 3-factor structure of the M-ABC-2, with only modest correlations between each factor. Conclusions: The confirmatory factor analyses undertaken in this study further validate the structural validity of the M-ABC-2 as it has developed over time. Although its tasks are largely associated with the three sub-components within each age band, there was also clear evidence for a change in the factor structure towards differentiation in motor abilities with age. | en |
dc.format.extent | 486976 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Research in Developmental Disabilities | |
dc.subject | construct validity | |
dc.subject | developmental coordination disorder (DCD) | |
dc.subject | factor analysis | |
dc.subject | movement ABC | |
dc.title | Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test : factor structure comparisons across three age groups | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Psychology | |
dc.contributor.institution | Health & Human Sciences Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.institution | Cognitive Neuropsychology | |
dc.contributor.institution | Psychology | |
dc.contributor.institution | Health and Clinical Psychology Research Group | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |