Plural morphology in compounding is not good evidence to support the dual mechanism model
Hayes, J., Murphy, V., Peters, L., Smith, Pamela and Davey, N.
(2001)
Plural morphology in compounding is not good evidence to support the dual mechanism model.
In:
Proceedings of the Fourth International conference on Cognitive Modeling :.
UNSPECIFIED.
ISBN 0-8058-4041-7
The compounding phenomena is considered to be good evidence to support the dual mechanism model of morphological processing (Pinker & Prince, 1992). However evidence from initial neural net modeling has shown that a single route associative memory based account might provide an equally, if not more valid explanation of the treatment of plurals in compounds. Further neural net modeling and empirical work is proposed to test this single route account
Item Type | Book Section |
---|---|
Date Deposited | 15 May 2025 16:29 |
Last Modified | 30 May 2025 23:12 |
Explore Further
-
picture_as_pdf - 900903.pdf
-
subject - Submitted Version
Share this file
Downloads