Empowering researchers and healthcare professionals in academic publishing: key insights and practical lessons from the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) workshop 2025
The British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) Academic Publishing Workshop, held at the Birmingham City Event Centre in the UK from 19 to 20 March 2025, provided practical guidance for early-career researchers and healthcare professionals seeking to understand and actively engage with the academic publishing process. This perspective extends the workshop’s expert insights to those who were unable to attend, summarizing key lessons across five thematic sessions. The first session addressed journal selection, guiding participants on evaluating scope, impact metrics, open-access models and identifying predatory journals. The second explored peer-review models including single-blind, double-blind and open review, and reinforced reviewers’ role as guardians of research integrity. The third session focused on writing effective structured abstracts and developing resilience in managing desk and post-review rejections. The fourth provided a practical framework for converting conference poster presentations into full manuscripts. The fifth examined the evolving role of artificial intelligence in academic publishing, including its benefits for writing support and literature discovery, alongside ethical considerations. Complementing these sessions, hands-on peer-review exercises enabled participants to develop and apply concrete manuscript evaluation skills in a collaborative setting. This perspective underscores that successful academic publishing demands continuous professional development, and that structured, expert-led training is essential for advancing research careers and maximizing scholarly impact.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Identification Number | 10.1093/jacamr/dlag082 |
| Additional information | © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
| Keywords | antimicrobial stewardship (ams), antimicrobial stewardship (ams), antimicrobial stewardship (ams), antimicrobial stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship (asp) intervention, antimicrobial stewardship outcome, antimicrobial stewardship programs, antimicrobial resistance (amr), antimicrobial resistance (amr), antimicrobial resistance (amr), antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial resistance,, antimicrobial resistance;, academic publishing, peer review, peer review processes, peer review, research, peer reviews, early-career researchers, early-career, early-career researcher, ecr, scientific writing, research dissemination, open access publishing, open access, open access, open access, predatory journals, research integrity, literature review, literature review as topic, literature review, scholarly communication, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence (ai), artificial intelligence act, artificial intelligence (ai), artificial intelligence and machine learning, artificial intelligence framework, artificial intelligence tools, artificial intelligence regulation, artificial intelligence-based models, medical education, healthcare professionals, healthcare professionals’ perspectives, publishing ethics, journal selection, conference to publication, evidence dissemination, capacity building, capacity building, capacity building and knowledge, pharmacology (medical), infectious diseases, microbiology (medical), health policy, education, library and information sciences, public health, environmental and occupational health |
| Date Deposited | 02 Jun 2026 13:05 |
| Last Modified | 02 Jun 2026 13:05 |
