On the institutional foundations of law : The insufficiency of custom and private ordering
Some theorists propose that systems of law largely arise spontaneously, as an extension of customary rules. At most, the role of the state is to endorse customary laws and add some minimal general rules. Some see no essential difference between custom and law. By contrast, this paper argues that law has properties that cannot be reduced to custom or private ordering alone. Customary mechanisms are insufficient to explain adherence to complex systems of law. Furthermore, law proper arose when customs were violated and some higher adjudication was required. We require an explanation of how a system of complex legal rules may be enforced, and why people often obey laws in the absence of obvious incentives or disincentives. Laws and their enforcement depend on stratified social structures within the framework of the state.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Additional information | Original article can be found at: http://www.mesharpe.com Copyright ME Sharp [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA] |
Keywords | law, custom, private ordering, the state, spontaneous order, friedrich hayek |
Date Deposited | 15 May 2025 12:16 |
Last Modified | 30 May 2025 23:48 |
-
picture_as_pdf - Inst_Found_Law.pdf
-
subject - Published Version
-
lock - Restricted to Repository staff only