Understanding reasons without reenactment : Comment on Stueber
Hutto, Daniel
(2012)
Understanding reasons without reenactment : Comment on Stueber.
Emotion Review, 4 (1).
pp. 66-67.
ISSN 1754-0747
This comment on Stueber’s article clarifies the nature of the core disagreement between his approach to understanding reasons and mine. The purely philosophical nature of the dispute is highlighted. It is argued that understanding someone’s narrative often suffices for understanding the person’s reasons in ordinary cases. It is observed that Stueber has yet to provide a compelling counter case. There is also a brief clarification of some of the empirical commitments of the narrative practice hypothesis.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Identification Number | 10.1177/1754073911421384 |
Date Deposited | 15 May 2025 12:21 |
Last Modified | 10 Sep 2025 20:31 |
Explore Further
Full text not available from this repository.
Downloads
?
Total file downloads from UHRA since January 2020. For more information on metrics see the IRUS guide.