Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation

Gindis, David (2016) Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (3). pp. 499-513. ISSN 1744-1374
Copy

From the legal point of view, ‘person’ is not co-extensive with ‘human being’. Nor is it synonymous with ‘rational being’ or ‘responsible subject’. Much of the confusion surrounding the issue of the firm's legal personality is due to the tendency to address the matter with only these, all too often conflated, definitions of personhood in mind. On the contrary, when the term ‘person’ is defined in line with its original meaning as ‘mask’ worn in the legal drama, it is easy to see that it is only the capacity to attract legal relations that defines the legal person. This definition, that avoids the undesirable emotional associations and equivocations that often plague the debate, is important for a legally grounded view of the firm


picture_as_pdf
Gindis_Accepted_Manuscript.pdf
subject
Submitted Version

View Download

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core RIOXX2 XML OpenURL ContextObject in Span MODS METS Data Cite XML MPEG-21 DIDL OpenURL ContextObject HTML Citation ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads