The Case for Teaching Syllogistic Logic to Philosophy Students

Larvor, Brendan (2004) The Case for Teaching Syllogistic Logic to Philosophy Students. Discourse, 4 (1). pp. 130-136. ISSN 1741-4164
Copy

Syllogistic logic is a superseded theory, so why bother to teach it? In fact, it has many benefits for general philosophy students. Some are virtues of syllogistic logic alone; others arise from the contrast between syllogistic and mathematical logics. Syllogistic is a better vehicle for teaching general notions such as validity and soundness. Its several techniques for checking validity allows students to distinguish validity from the procedures to check for it. It supports students’ readings of historical philosophical texts. The contrast with mathematical logics supports meta-logical discussion and reduces alienation as students find that some great dead logicians share their intuitions. In any case, syllogistic logic is not intellectually dead. The work of Blanché and Béziau demonstrates this.


picture_as_pdf
Pages_from_Vol_4_1_autumn2004.pdf
subject
Published Version

View Download

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core OpenURL ContextObject in Span METS HTML Citation MODS MPEG-21 DIDL ASCII Citation OpenURL ContextObject Data Cite XML RIOXX2 XML
Export

Downloads