| dc.contributor.author | Randle, Keith | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grey, Susan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Blair, Helen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-03T16:23:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-03T16:23:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1998-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Randle , K , Grey , S & Blair , H 1998 , ' A Pernicious panacea: a critical evaluation of business re-engineering ' , New Technology, Work and Employment , vol. 13 , no. 2 , pp. 116-128 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00045 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0268-1072 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/18740 | |
| dc.description | Helen Blair, Susan Grey and Keith Randle, 'A pernicioius panacea - a critical evaluation of business re-engineering', New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 13 (2): 116 - 128, September 1998, DOI: 10.1111/1468-005X.00045. © Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1998. | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article investigates the practicalities of implementing business process re-engineering (BPR) through two case studies, DefCo and ServiCo in the public sector. It demonstrates the destructive and insidious nature of BPR, and deconstructs the myth that BPR represents a discontinuity in management thinking. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 13 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | New Technology, Work and Employment | |
| dc.subject | busines process re-engineering | |
| dc.title | A Pernicious panacea: a critical evaluation of business re-engineering | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | Registry | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Schools of Law and Education | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
| rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1111/1468-005X.00045 | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
| herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |
