Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorFulton, Emmie
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Katherine
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-16T01:13:40Z
dc.date.available2019-11-16T01:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.identifier.citationCurtis , K , Fulton , E & Brown , K 2018 , ' Factors influencing application of behavioural science evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners, and implications for practice ' , Preventive Medicine Reports , vol. 12 , pp. 106-115 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.012
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2472-5754/work/64667984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21901
dc.description© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
dc.description.abstractThe National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends behavioural science evidence underpins public health improvement services. In practice, level of implementation varies. This study is the first to explore factors affecting use of behaviour-specific evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners for design and delivery of health improvement services. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted, along with a review of the commissioning cycle with public health decision-makers and practitioners across a range of health improvement fields (e.g. weight management). Interviews were informed and analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Limited comprehension of behaviour change, challenges identifying specific behaviour change strategies and translating research into practice were prevalent. Local authority processes encouraged uptake of evidence to justify solutions as opposed to evidence-driven decision-making. Some decision-makers perceived research evidence may stifle innovation and overwhelm practitioners. Potential facilitators of research use included: ensuring uptake and implementation of evidence is compulsory within commissioning and its potential to show value for money. A strong belief in local evidence and achieving outcomes were identified as barriers to research evidence uptake. Social and environmental challenges included cultural, political, and workload pressures and journal article accessibility. Embedding behavioural science systematically into public health practice requires changes throughout the public health system; from priorities set by national public health leaders to the way in which relevant evidence is disseminated. Framing factors affecting use of behavioural science evidence using the TDF is helpful for identifying the range of interventions and support needed to affect change.en
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent283145
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPreventive Medicine Reports
dc.subjectBehaviour change
dc.subjectBehavioural science
dc.subjectEvidence
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectResearch translation
dc.subjectTheoretical Domains Framework
dc.subjectHealth Informatics
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.titleFactors influencing application of behavioural science evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners, and implications for practiceen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionBehaviour Change in Health and Business
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053135188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.012
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record