dc.contributor.author | Hutto, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-20T08:43:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-20T08:43:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | In : 'Radical Enactivism : Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative; Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto', edited by Menary, R., pp.81-105 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-9027241511 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9027241511 | |
dc.identifier.other | 103301 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/6012 | |
dc.description | Full text of this chapter is not available in the UHRA | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Rudd is right to observe that it is, “significant that the paper repeatedly mentions “basic” or “primitive” emotions” (Rudd: this volume). And he is sensitive enough to note that, “ Hutto does recognize that the “basic” emotions are open to modification in particular cases (17), so he doesn’t accept the full avocado pear model – his view suggests rather the image of a (genetically modified?) avocado whose core is itself somewhat malleable” (Rudd: this volume). This too is right, only I see the avocado core as being modified culturally or through individual experience, not genetically. My view is that some of our interpersonal response patters are re-tied through enculturation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Consciousness and Emotion Book Series; | |
dc.title | Both Bradley and Biology : reply to Rudd. | en_US |
dc.type | Book chapter | en_US |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |