Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHutto, D.
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-20T08:43:59Z
dc.date.available2011-06-20T08:43:59Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationIn : 'Radical Enactivism : Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative; Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto', edited by Menary, R., pp.81-105en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-9027241511
dc.identifier.isbn9027241511
dc.identifier.other103301
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/6012
dc.descriptionFull text of this chapter is not available in the UHRAen_US
dc.description.abstractRudd is right to observe that it is, “significant that the paper repeatedly mentions “basic” or “primitive” emotions” (Rudd: this volume). And he is sensitive enough to note that, “ Hutto does recognize that the “basic” emotions are open to modification in particular cases (17), so he doesn’t accept the full avocado pear model – his view suggests rather the image of a (genetically modified?) avocado whose core is itself somewhat malleable” (Rudd: this volume). This too is right, only I see the avocado core as being modified culturally or through individual experience, not genetically. My view is that some of our interpersonal response patters are re-tied through enculturation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesConsciousness and Emotion Book Series;
dc.titleBoth Bradley and Biology : reply to Rudd.en_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record